Pepsi Cola Hits the Spot?
I hated it! The sales department wanted sales and my performance was based on minimizing credit losses. The tools I had to work with were archaic compared to today’s standards. My decisions were generally based on past history; trade association contacts and some customers submitted periodic financial statements.
My biggest credit loss came from an account where I thoroughly analyzed the customer financials. They appeared to have a solid growing business – yet they went bankrupt. How could that happen? I asked an association contact and he laughed. He said the owner was “a lying SOB” and the financial data I had was unaudited, falsified information.
I learned a valuable lesson. Financial data should not be automatically trusted no matter how official it may look. Remember the old saying, “Figures don’t lie, but liars can figure”.
Why I hate Wall Street
The tainted financial data I received was to hoodwink creditors. Today, executives of major corporations are massaging the financial data to hoodwink their owners; people like you and me who have invested our hard earned money in their company. The headline data that is touted by the company and mainstream press must always be looked at with suspicion.
Why? Top management’s compensation is based on certain parameters. They will massage the data to make sure they maximize their personal compensation, even at the expense of doing their company long-term harm.
I am going to use Pepsi as an example. They are simply one lemming among thousands; all marching to the same tune. They obscure the facts and justify their behavior because everybody does it.
I have always been a Pepsi fan. Perhaps it was because of this 1940’s catchy jingle that every kid could sing word for word:
“Pepsi-Cola hits the spot, twelve full ounces, that’s a lot, twice as much for a nickel too. Pepsi-Cola is the drink for you.”
Pepsi has always tried to appeal to a younger crowd. This appeared on their company website when they released their last earnings announcement.
Following are comments from PepsiCo Chairman Indra Nooyi in their webcast.
“…. I’m pleased to report that 2016 is off to a good start with very strong operating results in the first quarter. Global snacks organic volume increased by 1.5% and global beverage organic volume increased 3%, the highest rate of quarterly beverage volume growth in three years.
…. We have performed well because our approach to operating in this environment is and has been to execute well against what we can control and to retool our business models and operating system to cope with what we believe could be sustained volatility and uncertainty. And this is really what we’re doing.”
Every number in their clever graphic and webcast is massaged to make management look good and encourage investors to buy their stock. A prudent investor is skeptical and seeks trusted sources for information.
Looking behind the curtain
Their official earnings announcement is full of legal mumbo-jumbo, footnotes, and unexplained acronyms, creating more distrust. Here are some examples:
- Organic revenue grew 3.5 percent and reported net revenue declined 3 percent.
- Core constant currency operating profit increased 12 percent. Reported operating profit decreased 10 percent reflecting the non-core impairment charge….
- Core EPS was $0.89 and reported EPS was $0.64. Core EPS excludes a $0.26 per share non-core impairment charge related to our 5% indirect equity interest in TAB.
If you want more mumbo-jumbo you can go to their unaudited five page Reconciliation of GAAP and Non-GAAP Information. GAAP = Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Nothing here builds trust and confidence.
All I want is the truth in plain understandable English. I looked to Marketwatch to decode the data.
|Gross Income||$6.66B||$6.76B||$100 million|
|Pretax Income||$1.39B||$1.60B||$210 million|
Their year over year (2015 vs. 2014) pre-tax earnings dropped from $8.76B to $7.44B ($1.3 billion). The sales/profit decline continues into 2016. If that’s a “strong start giving added confidence”, what’s a lousy start?
My broker gives PepsiCo an A rating, meaning it will strongly outperform the market. Are they “less bad” than the rest of the market? I found a paid investing service that said PepsiCo’s stock price is overvalued by 45.44%. Who should you trust?
Traps to Avoid
GAAP vs. non-GAAP adjustments.
Most of this is done to obscure the truth, or for tax reasons. Look at the real numbers. I found one example while pouring over the data. PepsiCo reported:
“In the 12 weeks ended March 19, 2016 we recognized $46 million of mark-to-market net gains on commodity hedges… These gains and losses are subsequently reflected in division results when the divisions recognize the cost of the underlying commodity in operating profit.”
What does that mean? As a cash basis taxpayer my profit arrived when my client’s check cleared the bank. The commodity gains might look good on paper, but you don’t capture your profit until you sell them.
Beware of the EPS (Earnings Per Share) game. EPS is a commonly used metric – taking the earnings for the period and dividing it by the numbers of shares outstanding. This metric should be suspect because it is generally used to determine executive bonuses. Manipulating EPS has become a creative art form designed to deceive.
In today’s economy many companies cannot improve their EPS by increasing earnings. Instead they are reducing the number of shares outstanding.
Recently I wrote about how this creates the illusion of improved performance. Prudent management borrows money to invest and earn more profit. Buying back company stock when it is at an all time high is short-term thinking with negative long-term implications.
In the last ten years PepsiCo has gone from 1.69 billion shares outstanding to 1.49 billion. Pepsi’s non-GAAP 1st quarter EPS was $.89 versus $.83 in 2015. The 2015 GAAP EPS numbers came in as $.64 versus $.81. Their EPS would have been around 11% lower had they not bought back 200 million shares in the open market. Pepsi reports lower earnings, while buying back high-priced shares with borrowed money. That breeds confidence?
Having one owner or 1.49B owners is irrelevant. Management should be evaluated by how the company performs in the competitive marketplace. Being deceitful should cause their compensation to go down, not up!
Pepsi is not alone. Former advisor to the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Danielle DiMartino Booth tells us:
“For seven straight quarters, over 20 percent of the companies in the S&P 500 have reduced their year-over-year share count by at least four percent, which conveniently translates into at least a four percent pop in their per share earnings. Ain’t math grand!”
Beating earnings estimates. The company, working with analysts, makes a prediction for their next earnings announcement. The trick is to estimate low. When earnings are announced Wall Street trumpets, “They beat the estimates!” Lousy companies can beat the estimates, “Hooray, they did not lose as much as we expected!” Never take this metric at face value, always look behind the curtain.
What can retail investors do?
- Use research tools you have available. While I chide my broker for the A rating for Pepsi, they have plenty of information online with the facts that are understandable. If you are going to invest your hard earned money spend some time checking them out.
- Validate your information from many sources. Sources that have potential conflict of interest can still be used, but with reservation. Validate and verify!
- Good quality research is still available – use it properly. Wall Street firms have great research departments. Investors should understand by the time their recommendations hit the public they have already acted on the data for themselves and their “special” ($100 million +) accounts. Pay more attention to the data than the current ratings. Independent, paid for, research firms are a growing industry. The good ones will provide a treasure of accurate information to educate their subscribers. Never invest your money based on a one-page write up, a broker recommendation, or headline data without doing a lot of corroboration with other sources.
Then and now
By the time I was in grade school, like young boys do, we reworded the Pepsi jingle:
“Pepsi-Cola hits the spot, specially when you’re on the pot. Press the button, pull the chain, there goes Pepsi down the drain.”
While Pepsi is far from bankrupt, their earnings are decreasing. Boomers and retirees cannot afford to be fooled and let their life savings go down the drain. Investors must demand that Pepsi, and every company listed on an exchange just tell the truth to your owners and potential investors – don’t try to sugar coat it.
In the meantime, put yourself well ahead of the crowd – spend an hour or so educating yourself about an investment candidate before you buy. Look behind the curtain when their earnings are announced. Building a list of trusted research sources will save you time and money. “Trust but verify” not only applies to nuclear arms treaties; but also looking at data before investing your hard earned money.
On The Lighter Side…
You know summer in the Midwest is just around the corner when you watch the Cubs and see the ivy on the outfield wall start turning green.
Every baseball fan knows exactly where we were when this photo was taken.
We are really looking forward to our midwestern summer. Instead of going to Cub games, much of our time will be spent watching our two grandsons, Brock and Braidyn play baseball. Win or lose, the beauty of sports to me is that it’s multi-generational. This is the most fun article I have ever written about baseball.
Here are some more quotes attributed to Albert Einstein:
- Joy in looking and comprehending is nature’s most beautiful gift.
- Intellectuals solve problems; geniuses prevent them.
- Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance, you must keep moving.
- Try not to become a man of success, but rather try to become a man of value.
As long as I’m discussing baseball:
- Everyone should be respected as an individual, but no one idolized
Until next time…