The Bond Market Is Nuts!

Comic - "The long and the short is we went long and got shorted."The bond market is absolutely nuts – devoid of any common sense.

Back in the days when professors used chalkboards, and actually taught classes, I studied Business Economics. We learned how capital and labor come together to produce goods and services, create jobs and profits. If capital was needed, you could borrow and pay interest. Interest is the rent you pay for using other people’s money.

The fundamental premise – the amount of interest paid was in relation to the amount of default risk.

Thanks to government intervention, that fundamental premise has been blown apart. I pulled up a recent quote from my online broker:

Fixed income offerings

“Through pride we are ever deceiving ourselves. But deep down below the surface of the average conscience a still, small voice says to us, something is out of tune.”

– Carl Jung

The risk/reward proposition is upside down. Theoretically, government bonds and Certificates of Deposit (CD’s) have the least amount of risk and therefore should have the lowest interest rates. Corporate bonds are rated by various agencies and risk is assigned accordingly.

Let’s look at the 10-year offerings. Top-quality AAA corporate bonds are paying 2.14%, CD’s are paying 2.45% and other government agencies are paying 2.79%. The highest risk pays the lower interest?

Want more interest? Lower graded A bonds pay 3.12%.

Investing $10,000 in A bonds pays $312 interest annually. A government agency bond pays $279 interest annually, $33 less than the A bond.

50% Discount

The Dividend Hunter – Tim PlaehnOur friend Tim Plaehn at The Dividend Hunter has set up a unique Monthly Dividend Paycheck Calendar system that can provide you with an average of $4,000 a month in extra income based on a model portfolio of $500,000.

For a limited time, he’s offering us a 50% discount on the first year of a subscription: just $49.

CLICK HERE for more information.

Do you trust the rating agency?

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) bulletin, The ABCs of Credit Ratings, cautions investors: (my emphasis)

“Many credit rating agencies…are paid by the…issuers of the securities they rate. This creates a potential conflict of interest…the credit rating agency may be influenced to determine more favorable (i.e., higher) ratings than warranted to retain the obligors or issuers as clients….”

Is the extra $33 worth the risk when you are unsure of the credit rating?

What about higher interest lower rated bonds?

Bloomberg’s warns, A $1 Trillion Powder Keg Threatens the Corporate Bond Market: (my emphasis)

“Bloomberg News delved into 50 of the biggest corporate acquisitions over the last five years, and found…By one key measure, more than half of the acquiring companies pushed their leverage to levels typical of junk-rated peers. But those companies, which have almost $1 trillion of debt, have been allowed to maintain investment-grade ratings by Moody’s Investors Service and S&P Global Ratings.

…. To avoid tipping over the edge now, they will have to deliver on lofty promises to cut costs and pay down borrowings quickly, before the easy money ends.”

It’s estimated that $2.5 trillion is invested in BBB grade bonds. Bloomberg warns over $1 trillion should be rated as junk bonds, but are not because of “lofty promises”.

Investors must ask, is the interest rate differential worth the risk? Is the risk clearly and honestly defined by the rating agency? If there is a default you could lose some or all of your money.

I call BBB bonds, “Bottom of the Barrel” and I sure don’t trust the rating agencies.

Investors versus speculators

The Fed and world central banks are buying bonds, keeping interest rates at historically low levels. In a free market, the huge availability of debt would push rates to a more realistic risk/reward ratio. Because of central bank intervention, many government and corporate bonds now offer zero to negative interest rates.

Wolf Street reports, “Negative-Yielding Junk Bonds Have Arrived in Europe”, “The total amount of bonds with negative yields has risen to nearly $13 trillion.”

Zerohedge tells us, “A third of All European Investment Grade Bonds Have Negative Yields”.

Currency expert Chuck Butler recently told us, “I do believe the Fed will get around to having negative deposit rates, but not negative-yielding bonds… Of course, the severity of the next depression will dictate if bond yields go negative or not.”

With zero to negative rates, not only is the lender paying the borrower, they also incur the risk of default. That’s like paying a pyromaniac to live in your rental property.

If that is not nuts, I don’t know what is. My grandmother was better off when she hid her cash in a Mason Jar!

Who is fool enough to buy the zero to negative interest bonds?

Wolf Street tells us why there is a market for these lousy bonds:

“In a negative-yield environment,…you’d be guaranteed a loss. You’d have to buy them solely on the hopes of even more deeply negative yields in the near future that would allow you to slough off these critters to the next guy before they eat you up.”

Buying bonds in anticipation of interest rates changes, in order to sell them in the future for a profit is speculation – not recommended for retirees. Speculators are betting on what the government is going to do in the future.

Bonds used to provide safe, reliable fixed income; particularly for retirees. You would buy a bond, collect the interest and hold it to maturity. That is called investing.

Annuity Guide – Click Here!

Economics of bond speculation

Speculators bet on the direction and trend of interest rates. If you bought a bond paying 2% interest, and the current rates rise to 3%, the resale value of your bond will drop to compensate for the current available rates. Conversely, if the interest rates dropped to 1%, the resale value of your bond would increase.

The amount of increase/or decrease is called “duration”. It is based on the interest rate and remaining life of the bond. If you want more information, Investopedia has provided a Duration calculator. That is for speculators.

Retirees should be investors. If you buy a bond, you should plan on holding it to maturity and collecting the interest along the way. The changes in resale value of their bond is really not important (unless there is an increasing probability of default), you plan on getting your money back when it matures.

How’s it working out for the speculators?

Wolf Street reports, “Negative Yielding Bonds Turn Into Punishment Bonds”:

“…. The Fed has cut its interest rate target twice, by a total of 50 basis points, and short-term Treasury yields have fallen by about that much.… The one-month yield now down to 1.56% and the 10-year yield up at 1.94%…. (Emphasis mine)

…. For holders of long-term bonds that they bought with negative yields, it is a very unpleasant experience when prices of those negative-yielding bonds also drop. And that’s what they’re facing now.

…. Investors are having to absorb a flood of government and corporate debt coming on the market in the US, Europe, and elsewhere, looking for buyers.”

The mountainous amount of negative-yielding debt had peaked at a mind-bending $17.03 trillion on August 29, but has since then plunged by $5 trillion,…to $11.94 trillion…still a huge gigantic amount of sheer absurdity….”

Big boy speculators bet over $17 trillion on the idea that interest rates would go lower, which they have, yet yields have increased. The resale value of the bonds decreased while they still pay the borrower to use their money.

If yields dropped would they be guaranteed a profit?

The speculators think so, or they wouldn’t have risked trillions. Could this work for the average retiree trying to make their 401k last?

When the government bailed out the banks in 2008, many investors were shocked when banks and bondholders called in their debt. We didn’t experience the rise in value of our holdings as they were called in (legally) by the debtor.

What happens if negative rates were to double? Can the borrower just call in the debt and then lend it back out at an even better negative rate for them?

Non-callable bonds?

I went to my online broker, researching available bonds. My search criteria were high investment quality, non-callable bonds maturing between November 2020 and December 2029. Here is what popped up on the screen:

Search results: "There are no bonds which meet your search criteria..."

Note the last line, “There are no bonds which meet your search criteria…” There are some resale, non-callable bonds available. You need to be very selective in finding good ones.

That callable feature protects the borrower at the lender’s expense and changes the risk/reward scale dramatically.

Here is the real bet:

  • You lend your money to a borrower and hope they can pay you back.
  • They pay little interest or you will pay them for the right to use your money.
  • If interest rates rise you must continue to pay the borrower or resell your bonds at a loss.
  • If interest rates decline, you are not guaranteed you can resell your bonds at a profit; the borrower may call them in (at par) at any time.

As we learned in 2008, there is a point where the borrower finds it very profitable to call in the debt and re-borrow at a more favorable rate for them.

You may resell your bonds at a profit but the potential for extraordinary gains is capped. The borrower WILL call in the bonds before that happens.

The entire bond market is nuts!

Currently, CD’s are paying interest close to higher risk bonds. Non-callable, resale CD’s are available online. Leave the speculation to others. Your money is FDIC insured and you will sleep better at night.


GoldSilver.comConcerned about possible high inflation? Need to protect the buying power of your nest egg?

During the high inflation Carter years, gold prices rose ahead of the inflation rate. Baby boomers and retirees want adequate inflation protection, for the lowest possible price.

Our affiliate offers a “best price” guarantee.

Click here for more information.

On The Lighter Side

I hope everyone had a wonderful Thanksgiving holiday. We enjoyed a casual dinner with our friends, the Carlson’s. It felt like the day after Thanksgiving someone flipped a switch and the pace really picked up for Christmas.

TV commercials were all pushing Black Friday pricing. My friend Bob O. has a theory about saving money on Black Friday – don’t leave the house or turn on the computer and you will save a lot of money.

If you didn’t get to take advantage of some Black Friday pricing, don’t let the fear of missing out (FOMO) bother you. Soon there will be year-end pricing. Many retailers take inventory at the end of January so there will be some real bargains.

For those who use Amazon, please help us out by going through our Amazon paid link for your purchases. Their small stipend helps us offset our costs.

Jo sent me a terrific commercial. For those of us who remember ET, this is a wonderful message and they are not selling anything.

And Finally…

We will share some observations from friend Bob O. to close out the week:

  • I don’t do drugs. I find I get the same effect just by standing up really fast.
  • Be sure to set your scale back 10# at 1:00 AM the day after Thanksgiving, and keep it there throughout the holidays.
  • Wouldn’t you know it! Brain cells come and brain cells go, but FAT cells live forever.

And my favorite:

  • Snowmen fall from Heaven un-assembled.

Until next time…

Dennis Miller

“Economic independence is the foundation of the only sort of freedom worth a damn.” – H. L. Mencken


Affiliate Link Disclosure This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase after clicking these links, we will earn a commission that goes to help keep Miller on the Money running. Thank you for your support!


  • Gordon

    I agree that the bond market is nuts, but I was watching an interview on Real Vision ( [Link deleted]if you’re not familiar with it) in which I had a sudden insight as to why investors, especially in Europe, are willing to accept negative interest rates.
    When the banking system collapsed there back in what, 2013?, the depositors were “bailed in”, which is to say, their deposits were confiscated. Many large depositors are now willing to accept slightly negative rates on bonds as a guarantee that if their banks collapse, they will still be able to get their money back (well, most of it).
    If large depositors were absolutely confident that their banks were safe, they would not buy bonds at negative rates, as they are mostly concerned about the return of their money, not the return on their money. So I see negative rates as a vote of limited confidence in the banks, which, by-the-way, I see as a fully rational vote.
    This has led me to wonder if the central banks were already considering the need for negative rates, and the obstacles to them, and thus, the decision to allow Cyprus banks to fail was deliberate, but this a) assumes that the central bankers are more competent than evidence supports, and b) leads to all sorts of other tin-foil-hat ideas, which doesn’t mean that they are not true, just that they are not provable with evidence at hand.
    In any case, thanks for your work, and I am really glad you are back in the saddle, so to speak.
    Merry Christmas!

    • Dennis Miller

      Hi Gordon,

      You make a good point. The image of the Greek pensioner sitting on the sidewalk crying still haunts me. I wonder if FDIC insured would change that thinking.

      Best regards,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *